There are movies you remember liking as a kid, mostly because they felt big and loud and full of stuff jumping out at you. Then you revisit them as an adult and realize your childhood brain might’ve been grading on a curve. For me, Jumanji falls into that category. It’s not a terrible movie, but watching it now, it feels more like a chaotic special‑effects demo than something that sticks with you.
The story centers on a magical board game that basically hates everyone who plays it. Young Alan Parrish gets sucked into the game in 1969, and decades later, two kids named Judy and Peter find the game and start playing. Every roll unleashes some new disaster: giant mosquitoes, stampeding animals, angry hunters, you name it. Eventually Alan gets spit back out of the game as an adult, and the rest of the movie is everyone trying to finish the game so the madness stops.
On paper, it’s a fun idea. A board game that comes to life is the kind of concept that sounds great when you’re ten years old and imagining your toys attacking the living room. And to be fair, the movie does have a few moments where that idea shines. The stampede scene is still memorable, even if the CGI looks like it came from a computer that needed a nap. The vines taking over the house are cool. The quicksand floor gag still works. There’s definitely creativity here.
But the movie never slows down long enough to let any of it breathe. It’s just one disaster after another, and after a while, it starts to feel repetitive. Roll the dice, something scary happens, everyone screams, repeat. There’s not much room for character moments, and when the movie tries to squeeze them in, they feel rushed. Alan dealing with the trauma of being stuck in a jungle for decades should be interesting, but the movie barely touches it. Judy and Peter’s family situation is mentioned, then forgotten. Even the relationship between Alan and Sarah, which should have some emotional weight, gets pushed aside so the next CGI creature can burst through a window.
Robin Williams was in the middle of his “hyper‑energetic dad‑movie era” when this came out. He’d already done Mrs. Doubtfire and Aladdin, and he was about to do Flubber and Patch Adams. In Jumanji, he’s doing his usual Robin Williams thing, bouncing between jokes, panic, and heartfelt moments. He’s always fun to watch, but even he seems like he’s fighting the movie’s pacing. Every time he tries to have a quiet moment, something explodes or stampedes or screeches.
Bonnie Hunt is great, as she always is, but she doesn’t get much to do besides react to the chaos. Kirsten Dunst was still early in her career, and she does a solid job, but the movie doesn’t give her much room to shine. Bradley Pierce, who plays Peter, is fine, but again, the movie is too busy throwing animals at the screen to let the kids be actual characters.
The effects are a mixed bag. Some of the practical stuff looks good, but the CGI animals haven’t aged well. The monkeys, especially, look like they escaped from a forgotten PlayStation cutscene. I know it was 1995, but even then, they looked a little off. The movie leans so heavily on effects that when they don’t work, it pulls you out of the story.
One thing I’ll give the movie credit for is its energy. It never drags. If anything, it’s too energetic. It’s like the filmmakers were afraid the audience would get bored if more than ten seconds passed without something crashing through a wall. That makes it entertaining in a loud, popcorn‑movie way, but it also makes it hard to connect with anything happening.
Watching Jumanji now, it feels like a movie that was made for kids first and everyone else second. And that’s fine. Not every movie needs to be deep or emotional or layered. But when you’re revisiting it as an adult, you start noticing the cracks. The story is thin, the characters don’t get enough time, and the constant chaos gets tiring. It’s fun in small bursts, but it doesn’t hold up as well as some other 90s adventure movies.
Is it worth watching? Sure, if you’re in the mood for something loud and nostalgic. It’s not a bad time. It’s just not a great one. It’s the kind of movie you put on in the background while you’re doing something else, and every now and then you look up and think, “Oh yeah, I remember that part.”
A creative idea with fun moments, but too much chaos and not enough heart. Still watchable, but not a 90s classic in my book.
2.5 out of 5.0 stars
Discover more from The Retro Network
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
